略论中国传统司法裁判中的事实判断及其方法  

In Chinese tradition judicature referee's fact judgment and method

作　　者：管伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《政法论丛》2010年第1期87-93,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：山东政法学院基金项目"中国古代司法适用的方法论研究"(2008F02B)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：中国传统司法裁判中的事实判断无疑具有强烈的主观性色彩。尽管中国传统社会的司法物证和检验制度上取得了一定的发展,在一定程度上也为司法官的事实判断提供了必要的客观性资源,但不发达或落后的科技却始终难以为司法实践提供全方位的支持,因此,中国传统司法官据以进行事实判断的资源主要是来自于情理、习惯以及司法官个人的经验与智识。但这些带有强烈主观性色彩的判断资源,在没有正当程序和严密的事实认定规则制约下,其正当性的保障却只能寄托于司法官自身品格和丰富的经验与知识储备的理想化诉求上,其结果则可想而知。In the Chinese tradition judicature referee＇s fact judgment had the intense subjective color. Although Chinese tradition society＇s judicial matter witness and examination system had obtained certain development, also had provided the essential objectivity resources for judge＇s fact judgment, But the backwardness science and technology actually throughout with difficulty provided the omni - directional support for the judicial practice, therefore, the the resources which Chinese tradition judge carried on the fact judgment mainly come from the reason, the custom as well as the judge individual experience and the wisdom knowledge. But these subjective resources, if under no right procedure and the rule restriction, its validity safeguard only could repose actually in judge own moral character and the rich experience and on the knowledge reserve idealized demand, then it finally can be imagined.

关 键 词：司法裁判 事实判断 情理 习惯 经验与智识 

分 类 号：D909.2[政治法律—法学理论]