检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘艺林[1]
出 处:《教育理论与实践》2010年第2期11-15,共5页Theory and Practice of Education
基 金:全国教育科学"十五"规划国家重点课题"转型期西方教育哲学的发展及其对我国的启示"研究成果之一;课题批准号:AAA1009
摘 要:民主必须解决各种力量的制衡问题,在西方高等教育民主化进程中,贵族哲学、英才哲学和平等主义三种力量此消彼涨,最终达到了较好的平衡,形成了平等主义与英才哲学双峰对峙的格局。这种局面包含着高等教育哲学的深刻转型:高等教育由少数人的特权变成了人人都可以享受的基本人权,而平等主义教育哲学本身,尽管深孚众望,却面对着来自贵族哲学的压力和英才哲学的阻力等阻抗因素,还有它无力化解的许多矛盾,特别是平等主义与教育公平的矛盾以及学生权益与教育质量的矛盾。Democracy in education needs the check-and-balance mechanism. In the west, aristocratism, elitism and equalitarianism reached good balance in the democratization of higher education, which resulted in the situation where elitism and equalitarianism existed side by side. The situation embodies a profound shift of higher education philosophy: higher education has been turned into a fundamental pillar of human rights for all people instead of the privilege for the minority. At the same time, equalitarianism in higher education has to meet with the pressure from both aristocratism and elitism, and it also has to face some conflicts such as the contradiction between equalitarianism and educational equality, and the contradiction between student rights and educational quality.
分 类 号:G40-02[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.161.247