检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲娜[1]
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院医学人文学院,山东烟台264003
出 处:《医学与哲学(A)》2010年第4期23-24,49,共3页Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
摘 要:安乐死问题一直都是一个争议性话题。从学理上,安乐死可以分为自愿安乐死和无意愿安乐死。自由主义的伦理学分为义务论和功利主义。以自由主义哲学观来审视两类安乐死合法化问题:自愿安乐死体现病人自由意志的选择,是人格尊严之自主性的结果;无意愿安乐死是由利益相关人代为选择,符合社会利益的最大化。通过严格立法来规范安乐死行为,也应成为我国法律的理性选择。Euthanasia has always been a controversial topic for a long time.Doctrinally considered,euthanasia could be divided into voluntary euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia. On the basis of liberalism,the system of ethnics could be divided into deontological theory and utilitarianism. Two kinds of euthanasia legitimation will be researched with the theory of liberalism. Voluntary euthanasia is that patient selects according to his will,which is autonomy of the personal dignity; involuntary euthanasia is that stakeholder selects according his will,coincided with the max of social interests.We can regulate euthanasia through strict legislation,which is a rational choice that we should make in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117