个体幸福与社会兴利的诠释——伊壁鸠鲁与墨子幸福观之比较  

Hennessy of Individual Happiness and Social Interpretation——comparison of the happiness concepts of Epicurean and Mozi

作　　者：高尚国[1] 王学先[1] 

机构地区：[1]南华大学政治与公共管理学院,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《南华大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期14-17,共4页Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：在中西方伦理学史上,伊壁鸠鲁和墨子分别对幸福观问题做了自己的阐发,并形成各自独特的伦理学体系。在这两种思想基础差异较大的理论中,对个人合理欲望的肯定和对社会幸福的追求是相似的;而对个人幸福的关注程度和实现幸福的途径各有其不同的看法。对这两种幸福观进行比较研究,对人们关于幸福问题的解决,具有一定的借鉴意义。In the history of Chinese and Western ethics,Epicurus and Mozi have expounded their own theory on the concept of happiness,and form their own ethical system.In their theories which have quite different ideological foundation,their views on the reasonable desires of individual recognition and the pursuit of social well-being are similar.But the extent of concerns on the well-being of individuals and the ways to achieve happiness has its own different views.The comparative research on these two kinds of happiness concept has some reference significance on the solution of the problem of happiness.

关 键 词：伊壁鸠鲁 墨子 幸福观 比较 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]