“学词”与“词学”的分化  

From ci composing to ci criticism

作　　者：刘兴晖[1] 邓乔彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学中文系,广东广州510632

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第2期10-14,共5页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目<晚清民国词籍校勘研究>(批准号:09XTQ007)

摘　　要：晚清时期的词创作和词学研究体现出"学词"与"词学"并存的过渡特征。词作中存在明显的学问化倾向,往往成为记录词学成果的载体;而在词话、词选中,探求学词之法又是最主要的内容;造成了词创作缺乏性情,词学研究过于偏尚技术等种种弊端。随着现代词学观念的萌芽和发展,二者逐步疏离并分化,标志着现代词学学科的独立和学科意识的自觉。In the late Qing dynasty,Xue ci and ci xue coexisted in composing ci and ci criticism.Ci has become the vector of research achievements about which existed knowledge tendency and how to compose ci also was the core of ci hua and ci anthology which caused many disadvantages such as lack of disposition in composing ci and deviation skills in ci theory.Xue ci and ci xue was gradually departed with the establishment of modern subject of ci theory which marked the independent and consciousness of ci subject.

关 键 词：学词 词学 分化 性情 技巧化 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]