检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学中山医学院人体解剖学教研室,广东广州510080
出 处:《解剖科学进展》2010年第3期235-239,共5页Progress of Anatomical Sciences
摘 要:目的研究多种打分函数对计算机虚拟筛选β-分泌酶(β-secretase,BACE-1)抑制剂的影响。方法采用分子对接软件Surflex虚拟筛选了50个BACE-1的抑制剂和9950个无活性分子,同时应用5种打分函数对筛选的结果分别应用单个打分函数和多个打分函数组合得分排序。结果单独以Surflex_score一个函数抽提对接后的结合模式再进行打分排序后富集率为40,将Surflex_score和D_score两个函数组合后排序可获得48的富集率。结论组合多种不同的打分函数比单个打分函数打分能获得更多的活性化合物。Objective To explore the impact of the different scoring functions on the enrichment factors of virtual screening for β-secretase(BACE-1)inhibitors. Methods Virtual screening of the database composed of 50 BACE-1 inhibitors and 9950 inactive compounds for BACE-1 inhibitors were performed using docking program of Surflex, the results were scored and ranked with different single scoring functions and combine scoring functions. Results The enrichment factor(1%) was 40 when using the single surflex_score, the enrichment factor (1%) was 48 when combining the surflex_score and D_score to rank. Conclusion We prefer combine scoring functions to single scoring function because it can obtain more active compounds.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166