检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学政府管理学院,北京100871 [2]北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所,北京100871 [3]国家教育发展研究中心,北京100816
出 处:《教师教育研究》2010年第3期49-55,共7页Teacher Education Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金(70573028);世界银行"年轻学者支持计划"(7137639)
摘 要:本文在西部甲省20个县(50个乡镇)的抽样调查基础上,对农村基层学区人事管理体制和教师激励机制进行实证分析。研究发现,人事权力的配置与教师激励机制存在密切关系。由县教育局任命学区校长、并且由学区校长调配学区内教师的权力格局,比较有利于基层教师激励机制的建立;而人事权力的过度集中,或者县教育局和乡镇政府进行交叉控制,都不利于基层学区对教师的管理与激励。Based on a random survey for 50 school districts in 20 counties of western China, this paper empirically discusses the allocation of personnel powers and its impact on the design of teacher incentive scheme in rural education system. It shows that the moderate autonomy of personnel management for rural education district might facilitate the establishment of teacher' s incentive scheme. In such districts, the county education bureau controls the appointment of governor of township district, while the governor decides to allocate the teachers within the district. On the contrast, the excessive centralization by the county government or cross-cutting struggles of personnel powers between the different political bodies could undermine the incentive to teachers. Comparing with these two modes, the township government can make the better management of teachers, if it uniformly controls the personnel powers in rural education district.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.36.171