检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨武[1] 苗志敏[2] 杨松凯[2] 于兰贞[3] 王岩青[3]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院脑科医院办公室,266003 [2]青岛大学医学院附属医院院长办公室,266003 [3]青岛大学医学院附属医院科教部,266003
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2010年第8期883-888,共6页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:青岛大学青年科研基金课题(2008-086)
摘 要:目的构建科学、实用的主管护师综合评价指标体系。方法采用文献查阅和专家访谈设计指标体系,运用Delph法进行指标的筛选与评价标准的确立,层次分析法用于指标权重的确定,相关性分析和因子分析法检验指标体系的信度与效度。结果本研究构建的主管护师综合评价指标体系包括4项一级指标、12项二级指标和46项三级指标,确定了各级指标的权重,确认了指标体系良好的信度和效度。结论主管护师综合评价指标体系具有科学性、合理性和可操作性,可作为主管护师综合评价、绩效考核、聘任及晋升的有效决策工具和评价依据。Objective To establish scientific and normative Supervisor Nurse Comprehensive Evaluation Index System(SNCEIS). Methods The method of literature and experts interview were adopted to index system design. Then the indexes and appraisal criterions were screened by applying Delphi method. At last Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was used to set weight coefficient of each index while the reliability and validity were examined based on correlation analysis and factor analysis. Results The SNCEIS included 4 Class I indexes, 12 Class II indexes and 46 Class III indexes. The weight of indexes was identified before the good reliability and validity of SNCEIS were verified. Conclusions SNCEIS is scientific, valid and feasible. Therefore, it can become the decision-making tool and evaluation criterion in supervisor nurses' comprehensive evaluation, performance appraisal, position appointment and promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15