检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王夫亮[1] 胡兴军[1] 杨博[1] 傅立敏[1]
出 处:《汽车工程》2010年第6期477-481,共5页Automotive Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(60222207);吉林大学‘985’工程项目资助
摘 要:分别采用稳态方法和基于动网格技术的动态方法对侧风作用下的汽车外流场进行了3种情况的数值模拟,将3种模拟结果进行对比,同时将部分模拟结果与试验值进行了对比。结果表明合理选用数值模拟方案可获得较满意的计算结果;地面边界层对计算结果影响较大;稳态方法和动态方法的流场分布、阻力系数和升力系数以及较弱侧风条件下的侧向力系数有较好的一致性,强侧风条件下的侧向力系数则差别较大。Three different numerical simulations on the exterior flow field around a car under the effect of crosswind are conducted respectively with both steady method and dynamic method based on moving mesh tech- nique, and the results are compared to each other and with test one. The results show that satisfying results can be obtained with proper scheme of numerical simulation and the ground boundary layer has significant effect on simula- ted results. For the distribution of flow field, drag coefficient, lift force coefficient, and side force coefficient under weak crosswind, the results are in good agreement with each other, but an apparent discrepancy can be found for side force coefficient under strong crosswind.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28