检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062
出 处:《心理科学》2010年第3期729-731,共3页Journal of Psychological Science
摘 要:目的:研究非临床社交焦虑个体的注意偏向,并比较词和面孔表情作为实验材料的敏感性。方法:被试26人,采用点探测任务,研究被试对不同类型刺激(威胁、快乐、中立)的注意偏向。结果:面孔表情任务中,高分组对威胁刺激反应时显著长于其它刺激,词语任务中差异不显著;低分组不存在偏向。结论:社交焦虑个体对威胁信息有回避倾向;面孔表情是区分社交焦虑注意偏向更有效的实验材料。This study examined the attentional bias in non-clinical social anxiety, and compared the sensitivity of words and facial expressions as stimuli. 26 subjects were required to execute a dot-probe task, which investigated the RT differences of the high social anxiety group (HSA) and the low social anxiety group (LSA)in response to different stimuli. The results found HSA tended to avoid threatening stimuli rather than happy and neutral stimuli. This trend was more significant when facial expressions were used as stimuli, an indication that facial expressions is a more sensitive index than words. No attentional bias was found in LSA.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118