操作主义可操作吗?——对操作性定义理论的历史梳理与个案分析  

Is Operationism Operational?——A Historical and Case Analysis of Operationism

作　　者：高剑婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学,南京210046

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期90-93,共4页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：操作主义本身存在着缺陷,其在具体操作中的困难,使操作主义难以继续成为元理论来支持某种具体的实验研究。操作主义在心理学界的持续影响力是一个值得反思的现象,它与心理学家对操作主义的误读有关,也与一些科学外的因素有关。笔者从历史梳理和个案分析的角度剖析了此现象,以期破除操作主义对心理学的长期统治。The flaw in operationism itself and the difficulties in its implementation prevent operationism from becoming a metatheory for empirical or experimental studies.Yet the sustainable influence of operationism in psychological studies is a strange phenomenon worthy of reflections,which is related both to the psychologists' misinterpretation of operationism and to some extra-scientific factors.This research gives a historical and case study of operationism and expects it will undermine the long-term reign of operationism in the field of psychology.

关 键 词：操作主义 科学外因素 认知疾病 

分 类 号：B84-069[哲学宗教—基础心理学]