兼顾公平与效率:美国“补充教育服务”政策评析  

Both Equity and Efficiency:Review of Supplemental Educational Services Policy

作　　者：孔令帅[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学教育学院,上海200234

出　　处：《比较教育研究》2010年第9期48-52,共5页International and Comparative Education

基　　金：上海师范大学重点学科项目"基础教育改革与发展";北京市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题"推进北京市基础教育区域均衡发展的研究--国际比较的视角"(项目批号:AAA08002)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：2002年的NCLB法案规定,凡是接受联邦TitleⅠ资助,有"处于第二年的需要改进学校"的学区必须实施补充教育服务(SES)政策。补充教育服务政策在制定、执行和评估中较好地兼顾了公平和效率,引起了很多美国学生和家长的兴趣。不过,该政策在公平和效率方面还存在着一些问题。Under the No Child left Behind Act of 2002, school districts that receive federal Title I education fund and have a ＂school in need of improvement-year two＂ must implement Supplemental Educational Services （SES）. SES policy has paid much attention to equity and efficiency during policy making, policy execution and policy evaluation, so that many American students and parents were significantly interested in SES. However, this policy still has some problems of both equity and efficiency.

关 键 词：美国 补充教育服务 教育政策 不让一个孩子掉队法 

分 类 号：G510[文化科学—教育学]