检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志超[1] 刘洪婷[1] 赵武校[1] 刘伟民[1] 甘露[1] 钟德东[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院视光科,广西视光中心,南宁530021
出 处:《中国临床新医学》2010年第8期704-706,共3页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
基 金:广西壮族自治区卫生厅重点科研课题(桂卫重200730)
摘 要:目的探讨视知觉学习与传统疗法治疗屈光不正性弱视的疗效差异。方法采用临床病例对照研究方法,从2006-06~2009-08在广西视光中心就诊的弱视儿童中选择年龄4~7岁,治疗时间均为1年的弱视患者共172例;按治疗方法分为传统治疗方法组92例179眼,视知觉学习治疗组80例156眼。采用SPSS13.0统计软件,行x^2检验比较两种治疗方法对屈光不正性弱视患者的治疗效果。结果两种方法对于治疗轻度弱视患者的疗效无统计学差异(x^2=0.007,P>0.05);对于中、重度弱视患者,视知觉学习治疗弱视的疗效优于传统弱视治疗方法(x^2=8.529,P<0.01;x^2=6.430,P<0.05)。结论视知觉学习治疗中、重度屈光不正性弱视患者的疗效优于传统弱视治疗方法,具有"个性化治疗"的特点。Objective To investigate the different efficacy in the treatment of ametrople amhlyopia by conventional therapy and perceptual learning. Methods Clinical cases control study. From June 2006 to August 2009, 172 eases of amblyopes, aged from 4 to 7 years old, underwent one year' s treatment in Vision Science and Optometry Center of Guangxi, were recruited in our study. And they were divided into two groups according to the treatment they received. The efficacy of 179 eyes of 92 amblyopes in conventional therapy group and 156 eyes of 80 amblyopes in perceptual learning group were analyzed by Chi-square test with SPSS13.0 software. Results No significant differences was showed in efficacy between the two groups in the treatment of mild amblyopes (x^2 = 0. 007, P 〉 0. 05 ) ; but the efficacy of perceptual learning is better than conventional therapy in the treatment of moderate amblyopes (x^2 = 8. 529, P 〈 0.05 ) and severe amblyopes (x^2 = 6. 430, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Perceptual learning is better than conventional therapy in the treatment of amblyopia, reflecting a character of individual treatment for amblyopia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222