检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴新宁[1]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学课程与教学系学习科学研究中心,上海200062
出 处:《远程教育杂志》2010年第5期84-91,共8页Journal of Distance Education
基 金:上海市浦江人才计划资助项目"基于变构学习模型的科学教育有效方式研究:中欧比较的视角"(编号:2008;C类)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:20世纪80-90年代,北美及欧洲的认知科学及教育研究领域的有识之士,几乎同时启动了时学习机理的新探索,奠基了今日的学习科学。计算机科学技术的飞速发展催化并支撑了学习科学向教学及课程领域的渗透,新的课程发展参照系正在建立。来自发达国家及地区的课程改革成功经验,为理解学习科学与课程发展的关系提供了借鉴。例子表明了学习科学视域中课程发展的几个关键要素:学习者中心、追求理解、促进卓越、个体道德——社会——智力的全面发展,以及技术的不可或缺。论证也表明,学校教育功能难以满足新文化背景下个体发展的需要,难以履行教育的全部使命;非正式学习必将成为教育创新的一个基点。During 1980s-1990s, researchers of insights in the fields of cognitive science and educational research from North America and Europe start the exploration on the mechanism of learning, which founded today' s sciences of learning. The rapid development of computer technology has catalyzed and supported that learning sciences penetrating into the field of curriculum and instruction, and a new frame of reference is building up for curriculum development. Successful experience in curriculum reform from developed countries and regions provide references for understanding the relationship between learning sciences and curriculum development. Examples presented by this paper show significations of curriculum development in the views of leaning sciences, which suggest that the curriculum focus on: the learner, the pursuit of understanding, promoting excellence, ethical-social - intellectual development, and the uses of technology. These arguments also show that the function of school education can not meet the individual development needs in new cultural context. It is difficult for education in school to fulfill all the mission of education. Informal learning will become a point of educational innovation.
分 类 号:G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3