检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管伟[1]
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2010年第4期32-38,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
摘 要:中国古代法官在司法实践过程中固然存在着巨大的自由裁量的主观性空间,但这种主观性并非完全基于古代法官任意,而是在封建统治者乃至整个社会对于司法实践结果的价值期待的范围之内,依靠长时期伦理教育及社会实践经验能动行使的结果。但古代中国在缺乏法律至上及逻辑规则制约下的能动司法,必然存在着专擅的司法、腐败的司法的巨大可能性。Though the ancient Chinese judges enjoyed the huge subjectivity of discretionary power in the judicial process,the subjectivity is not entirely based on the judges' discretion but in the range of the value expectations of the feudal rulers and the whole community,and is the result of implementation of the judicial activism by the ancient Chinese judges through their long practical experience depending on their long practical experience in ethical education and social practice.The judicial activism in Ancient China but does not mean the arbitrariness,however,in the absence of the supremacy of law and the logical rules,there exist includes the enormous possibilities of judicial corruption and autarchy in its implementation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.212.224