课程及教师评估问卷CAPE的信度及效度分析  

Chinese version of course and professor evaluation:Reliability and validity

作　　者：刘佳佳[1] 曹枫林[1] 程培霞[1] 陈倩倩[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学护理学院,山东济南250012

出　　处：《中国高等医学教育》2010年第11期45-46,91,共3页China Higher Medical Education

摘　　要：目的:考察CAPE中文版的信度和效度。方法:随机抽取了山东大学护理学院大一至大四年级的7门课程,进行CAPE问卷的信度和效度分析。对其中一门课程的30名学生间隔2周重测,评定重测信度。结果:CAPE中文版的Cronbachα系数为0.91;重测信度为0.75,P<0.01。主成分分析共提取3个因子,解释变异量的59.28%。结论:CAPE的信度、效度均较理想,可加以推广应用,但研究取样较局限,仍需进一步研究分析。Objective：To develop the Chinese version of the course and professor evaluation and examine its reliability and validity.Methods：Seven courses were randomly selected from freshmen to senior.The internal consistency reliability,test-retest reliability were examined.A factor analysis procedure was used to explore the factor structure of course and professor evaluation.Results：The Cronbachα was 0.91,and the test-retest reliability was 0.75,P0.01.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 components,which accounted for 59.28% of the explained variance.Conclusion：The Chinese version of the course and professor evaluation is a reliable and valid instrument for education evaluation.

关 键 词：教学评估 信度 效度 

分 类 号：G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]