检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药业》2011年第2期19-20,共2页China Pharmaceuticals
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划("973"计划)资助项目;项目编号:2007CB512601
摘 要:目的分析比较不同采集方法制备的吴茱萸中挥发性成分。方法分别采用水蒸气蒸馏法和顶空加热提取挥发性成分的方法,对其进行气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析。结果两种提取方法无论在成分还是其相对含量方面均存在一定的差异,采用水蒸气蒸馏法可鉴定出16种挥发性化学成分,采用顶空进样技术可鉴定出18种挥发性化学成分,共有成分为8种。结论两种样品采集方法,分别提供了不同沸点吴茱萸挥发物的化学信息;运用这两种方法可建立更全面的吴茱萸挥发性成分GC-MS表征体系。Objective To compare the difference of volatile components in fructu s evodiae prepared with different sample collection methods.Methods The volatil e components from fructus evodiae were extracted by steam distillation and heads pace injection respectively and then analyzed by GC-MS.Results There was a cert ain difference in the compositions and relative content of the volatile compound s between the above two extraction methods.16 volatile chemical compounds were i dentified in volatile oil obtained by SD,whereas 18 volatile components were ide ntified in the herb treated with HS;among the detected compounds in the samples treated with different method.There were 8 mutual compounds with different rela tive contents.Conclusion The above two methods of sample collection provides the chemical information of volatile matters with different boiling points from fru ctus evodiae,which can be used for establishing more comprehensive GC-MS repres entation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

