检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院医学人文学院应用心理学教研室,山东烟台264003
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第6期739-741,730,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的:考察儿童特质理解的心理理论的发展特点。方法:采用两个特质理解故事访谈了99名5-7岁儿童。结果:①5岁和7岁儿童的行为预测成绩差异显著;各年龄组儿童的情绪预测无显著差异;儿童行为预测和情绪预测的成绩没有显著差异。②除5岁组与6岁组之外,其他各组儿童在行为归因上的表现有显著差异;不同年龄组儿童在情绪归因上无显著差异;儿童在行为归因上的表现要显著好于情绪归因。结论:儿童的行为预测和情绪预测能力没有差别;行为归因要明显好于情绪归因。Objective:The experiment inspected the development of children's trait-understanding.Methods:Two trait-understanding stories were told to interview 99 5-to 7-year-old children.Results:①The performance of behavior prediction had significant difference between 5 and 7 year-old children;There were no differences in emotion prediction between different groups;The performance of behavior prediction and emotion prediction had no difference.②There were significant differences in behavior attribution among different age groups besides 5 and 6 years old;There were no differences in emotion attribution among different age groups;children's behavior attribution was remarkably better than emotion attribution.Conclusion:Children's predicting ability of behavior and emotion didn't differentiate among different age groups;children's behavior attribution was remarkably better than emotion attribution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145