高职院校大学生营养评价方法探讨  

A STUDY ON METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF NUTRITIONAL STAYUS OF VOCATIONAL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

作　　者：汝骅[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州市职业大学营养与检测教研室,苏州215104

出　　处：《现代预防医学》2011年第3期435-438,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine

基　　金：江苏省"青蓝工程"资助项目(苏教师[2007]2号);2010年度苏州市级课题(GJN102206)

摘　　要：[目的]探讨高职院校大学生营养评价方法。[方法]随机整群抽取高职院校大学生452人,年龄18～25岁。测量身高、体重、腰围(WC)、臀围(HC)、肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)和肩胛下角皮褶厚度(SSF)、体脂含量(BF%)等指标,并采用体质指数BMI(WHO、WGOC)、标准体重指数(改良Broca)、WC、腰臀比(WHR)、Oeder指数、BF%(BIA-OMRON、长岭-Brozek)等8种评价方法评价学生营养状况,分析不同评价方法的意义及相关性。[结果]高职院校大学生超重肥胖与消瘦同时存在,8种营养评价方法的评价结果有差异。[结论]建议以BMI、WC作为高职院校大学生常规评价指标,结合BF%、Oeder指数等指标进行综合评价,并进行男女分层统计。[Objective] To explore the methods of nutritional evaluation for vocational university students. [Methods] By cluster random sampling, selected 452 students aged 18-25 in a vocational university. Their height, weight, waist circumference （WC）, hip circumference （HC）, skin fold thickness （TSF and SSF）, body fat percentage （BF%） were determined. Students′nutritional status were classified through body mass index （BMI） and other eight kinds of evaluation methods. And different evaluation methods and correlation were analyzed. [Results] Malnutrition coexisted with overweight and obesity in vocational university. The evaluation results of 8 methods were different. [Conclusion] It is suggested that BMI and WC should be first selected as the evaluation indexes to comprehensively evaluate with BF% and Oeder index. The stratified analysis should be used between boys and girls.

关 键 词：大学生 营养状况 评价研究 

分 类 号：R153.9[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学]