浅议“可视为新的证据”制度及其对民行检察工作的影响  

On "Can be Considered as New Evidence" System and Its Impact on the Work of Attorney in China

作　　者：乔立鹤 王子健[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津市人民检察院办公室,天津300073 [2]天津市人民检察院民行处,天津300073

出　　处：《天津法学》2010年第2期87-91,共5页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：2008年11月8日,最高人民法院审判委员会通过了审监程序司法解释,提出了"可视为新的证据"作为启动再审程序的条件。然而",可视为新的证据"作为提起审判监督程序的概念、条件及应用与再审"新证据"近似却存在着不同,容易混同,故本文拟通过对二者概念、特征及条件进行比较与分辨,结合民行检察工作实践,就该制度在实践应用过程中可能产生的问题进行探讨,从而达到更好的认识这一新的制度,完善我国民行检察工作的目的。On November 8,2008,the judicial committee of the Supreme People＇s Court passed the judicial explanation of judgment supervision procedure.In the explanation,it proposed the concept of ＂can be considered as new evidence＂ which is the important condition of starting retrial procedure.The explanation consummated our system of judgment supervision.However,＂can be considered as new evidence＂ as the concept,conditions and applications of the trial supervision procedure is similar to retry ＂new evidence＂ which is not easy to distinguish.So the author discusses issues that may arise in the practical application in order to achieve a better understanding of this new system,and improve our prosecutions by comparing and distinguishing their concepts,characteristics and conditions combined with the supervision practice,

关 键 词：可视为新的证据 新证据 证据失权 举证时效 再审程序 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]