论口语形式纠错无效论的缺陷  

Oral formal error correction:Challenging the arguments against it

作　　者：余美根[1] 

机构地区：[1]西华师范大学,637002

出　　处：《现代外语》2011年第1期91-98,110,共8页Modern Foreign Languages

摘　　要：口语形式纠错是否有效是口语形式纠错研究的最基本问题。尽管有效论得到大多数研究者的认同,但支持无效论的言论一直存在。本文通过对无效论理论基础和方法论的研究,发现它在两方面都存有缺陷。无效论以无接口说为理论基础,但无接口说是由Krashen关于学习不能转换为习得的假说推导而来的,该假说并未得到学术界的普遍认同,存在缺陷。无效论方法论上的缺陷表现在两方面:第一,拒绝承认实证研究成功的案例,通过"推论"而非"证明"所有纠错都失败;第二,没有证明纠错失败是"无条件的",简单断定纠错必然失败。因此,本文认为口语形式纠错可以有效。This study is a survey about the effectiveness of error correction of oral forms.Literature reveals that there exist arguments against the effectiveness of error correction.The theoretical basis of these arguments is the non-interface hypothesis — a derivation of Krashen's hypothesis which states that learning cannot be transformed into acquisition.The obscurity of this hypothesis detracts from its validity,its methodological weaknesses are twofold:(1) the premise 'all corrections failed' ignores the success of some corrections;(2) it fails to prove that all unsuccessful cases are unconditional,and therefore overlooks factors that may lead to the failure of correction.This paper argues for the effectiveness of error correction.

关 键 词：口语形式纠错 无效论 缺陷 理论基础 方法论 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]