仲裁协议的书面形式要求——网络时代的再思考  

The Requirement of Written Form of the Arbitration Agreement——A rethink in the Internet Age

作　　者：丁颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京邮电大学人文学院,北京100876

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第3期139-146,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<在线非诉讼争议解决机制研究>(09CFX063);教育部人文社会科学研究项目<争议的在线解决机制研究>(08JC820006);北京邮电大学社科基金项目<在线解决纠纷若干法律问题研究>(2010BS01)

摘　　要：各国仲裁法及国际条约大多要求仲裁协议必须采取书面形式。书面形式要求的法律意义主要在于证明仲裁协议的存在及其内容,其至多构成仲裁协议的成立要件,而非国内多数学者认为的有效要件。因此,只要相关形式能够证明仲裁协议的存在及其内容,即应获得接受。进入网络时代,在线仲裁协议日益获得广泛运用,按照"功能等同原则",该类仲裁协议的书面形式同样可以得到认可。对于如何认定仲裁协议的"书面形式",我国《仲裁法》仍有完善空间。The majority of national arbitration laws and international conventions require that the arbitration agreement be in writing. The writing requirement is intended mainly to prove the existence of the arbitration agreement and its content, and this requirement can merely be considered as a condition of formation of the arbitration agreement, instead of a condition of validity as most domestic scholars think. Therefore, as long as a specific form can prove the existence of an arbitration agreement and its content, it should be accepted. The online arbitration agreement, which is increasingly used in the Internet Age, should also be accepted as satisfying the writing requirement, according to the principle of functional equivalence. With regard to how to define ＂ arbitration agreement in writing＂, the Arbitration Law of the PRC still needs to be further revised and perfected.

关 键 词：仲裁协议 书面形式 有效要件 成立要件 网络 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]