清末以降黄宗羲研究批判  

Review of the Research of Huang Zong-xi Since Late Qing Dynasty

作　　者：黄勇军[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2011年第2期125-128,共4页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：教育部2010年人文社科基金青年项目"传统中国女性政治的合法性研究"(10YJC810034)

摘　　要：清末以降,对黄宗羲的研究出现了各种误读现象。清末民初,出于政治斗争的需要,学者们将他的思想直接与西方民主、自由等思想相嫁接;五四时期,学者们在中西对立的框架下对其进行比较研究;建国后,马克思主义学者对他进行了新的阶级定性;文革时期,他被当成法家的代表人物予以肯定;改革开放以来,大陆、港台、海外学者开始在多元化的框架下建立起共同的研究平台。From Late Qing Dynasty, scholars believed that ＇western＇ and ＇modem＇ were the right standards when they did their research of Huang zong-xi＇s thoughts, and thus induced lots of misunderstand. In late Qing and early period of Republic of China, as the result of the political purpose, they regarded his political thoughts had equal value as the western ideas. In ＇May 4th Movement＇, they compared his thought with Western under the models of ＇East vs. West＇. In the early period of People＇s Republic of China, Marxism scholars re-classified his social position. During the Great Cultural Revolution, he was highly valued as a Legalist. From the period of Reform and Opening-up, the research about him became more and more diverse, and scholars have begun to build a common research flame.

关 键 词：清末以降 黄宗羲研究 误读 

分 类 号：B249.3[哲学宗教—中国哲学]