检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王泽群[1,2]
机构地区:[1]海南省海口市人民检察院,海南海口570125 [2]兰州大学西北少数民族研究中心
出 处:《河北法学》2010年第7期190-194,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:刑事庭审是刑事诉讼的中心环节,而对证据的判断和运用则是刑事庭审的核心内容,因此讨论刑事法庭审判中证据的判断与运用具有重大意义。首先,对基本的证据理论问题作以必要的辨明与解析,以消除长期存于理论界和实践部门的错误认识。其次,在程序设计上,应当构建科学高效的法庭质证和认证程序,并增设独立的证据异议和证据监察程序。再次,法官应当当庭认证,并对证据的判断与运用标准和依据向利害关系人作公开而充分的解释说明,防止暗箱操作,维护审判的公正和司法权威。Criminal judgment is the center of the criminal procedure,while judging and handling evidences is the core of criminal judgment.Therefore,it is great significant to study judging and handling evidences during the criminal judgment.Firstly,the basic evidence theories should be made clearly and parsed so as to eliminate mistaken cognition which chronically exists in the theory area and the practical departments.Secondly,it is crucial to establish reasonable and effective judicial questioning and authenticating procedure.Besides this,objecting procedure of evidence and supervising procedure of evidence should try to be added.Last but not least,judges should exert themselves to approbate the facts in the court,and explain the standard and gist of judging and handling evidences publicly and amply to the interested people,avoiding wire-pulling and vindicating the justice of trial and juridical authority.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33