史料发掘与《骆驼祥子》研究视野的新拓——以梁实秋和华思两篇被忽视的接受史料为例  

Historical Materials and Research Vision of"Rickshaw Boy"——Liang Shiqiu and Hua Si's Two Neglected Accepted Historical Materials

作　　者：陈思广[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期41-44,共4页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：四川省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(SC0804)

摘　　要：梁实秋和美国新闻处前总编华思上世纪40年代撰写的《读(骆驼祥子)》和《评(骆驼祥子)英译本》,是早期《骆驼祥子》接受传播研究中的重要史料,但失收于老舍研究的任何资料中。这两篇文章不仅能避免接受者的盲目与自信,纠正以往接受研究的偏差与问题,更能打开接受者认同与重构、修正与跨越的新视阈,堪称《骆驼祥子》接受传播史上的经典文献。Two important historical materials in 1940s,Read＂Rickshaw Boy＂written by Liang Shiqiu and Comment the English translation of＂Rickshaw Boy＂by Hua Si（the former editor-in-chief of news department of the United States）were neglected for a long time and excluded any material of Lao She study.In fact,these two historical materials not only avoid blind confidence of recipients about＂Rickshaw Boy＂study and correct the previous deviation and problems of accepting study but also open the new receiver vision in identification, reconstruction and appraisal.This two historical materials should be viewed as the classic document of accepting communication history about＂Rickshaw Boy.＂

关 键 词：梁实秋 华思 史料 《骆驼祥子》 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]