检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005 [2]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350108
出 处:《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第3期35-41,共7页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:面对当事人投诉无门难题等不正常现实情况,本文从审判权屏蔽民事诉权的现实困境切入,论证了民事诉权与民事审判权的不同属性定位,作为民事审判权的权源之民事诉权的本质是私权,而民事审判权并非纯粹公权力。因此,必须确立"不得拒绝裁判"原则,启动能动司法,树立民事审判权对民事诉权倾斜保护的理念,有诉必理,在司法技术上切实解决当事人投诉无门和"民事审判权拒绝裁判"的难题,保障广大当事人的诉讼人权。Fronting the normal reality such as the parties' none channel to complain,the paper has discussed the different attributes of right of civil action and civil judicial powers,beginning from the realistic puzzle of judicial powers shielding right of civil action.As the source of judicial powers,the essence of right of civil action is private right.But the civil judicial powers is not merely the public authority.Therefore,we must establish the principle of not refuse to judge,start active judiciary and erect the sense of civil judicial powers protecting the right of civil action.In order to protect the parties' human rights to litigate,it is important to effectively resolve the problems of the parties' none channel to complain and the court's refusing to judge in the judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.44.106