检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学中国中部经济发展研究中心,南昌330047 [2]南昌大学经济与管理学院,南昌330031 [3]华东师范大学长江流域发展研究院,上海200062
出 处:《世界地理研究》2011年第2期162-168,共7页World Regional Studies
基 金:江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地研究项目(编号:JD1003)
摘 要:史密斯提出的福利地理学分析范式是福祉地理学研究的重要理论基石。但由于发展观演变、福利向福祉概念的转向、福祉概念的复杂性、地理哲学思潮多元化及研究手段多样化等因素,使得福利向福祉拓展以及福利地理学向福祉地理学发展。分别从本体论、认识论、方法论和伦理性等方面探究了从福利地理学到福祉地理学的研究范式转向及特征,以此研究了福祉地理学研究范式的嬗变和新范式的理论基础,构建了福祉地理学的研究概念、哲学基础与方法体系。Well-being geography is an important branch of human geography. Theoretical analysis frame of welfare geography constructed by Smith is an important base for further research of well-being geography. However,taking into the evolution of development, the turn from welfare to well-being, complicated concept of well-being,multi-component of geography philosophy and multiple re search approaches,expanding from welfare to well-being and from welfare geography to well-being geography, the Paradigm turn and its characters from welfare geography to well-being geography were analyzed separately from the ontology, epistemology, methodology and ethics aspects of well-being geography so as to rebuild the research Paradigm of welfare geography and construct the concept of well-being geography, philosophy base and methodology system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222