检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《弹箭与制导学报》2011年第3期160-164,共5页Journal of Projectiles,Rockets,Missiles and Guidance
摘 要:文中研究了形函数线性扰动法、特征参数描述法、正交基函数法和CST方法这几种翼型参数化方法,对比了这几种翼型参数化方法用于对称翼型、弯度翼型和超临界翼型的拟合精度,拟合结果表明CST方法的拟合精度优于其他几种翼型参数化方法。建立了这几种翼型参数化方法的气动分析模型,采用拉丁超方试验设计方法获取样本点,构造了这几种翼型参数化方法的气动Kriging代理模型,将遗传算法与Kriging代理模型结合进行翼型的优化设计,并用两个算例对这几种翼型参数化方法进行验证。Some parameterized methods for airfoil were investigated in this paper, which contain linear shape function method, PARSEC method, orthogonal basis function method and Class-Shape function Transformation method. The fitting accuracy of these parameterized methods was contrasted in symmetric airfoil, cambered airfoil and supercritical airfoil. The fitting results show that the fitting accuracy of CST method is better than other parameterized methods for airfoil. The aerodynamic analysis models of these parameterized methods for airfoil were constructed. The Latin hypercube method was employed to get a set of sample points. The aerodynamic Kriging models of these parameterized methods for airfoil were built. The airfoil was optimized by combining genetic algorithm with Kriging model. These parameterized methods for-airfoil were validated by two applications.
关 键 词:正交基函数 CST方法 拟合精度 KRIGING模型 翼型优化设计
分 类 号:V211.3[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200