检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:别一鸣[1] 王殿海[1,2] 宋现敏[1] 邢岩[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学交通学院,吉林长春130022 [2]浙江大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《西南交通大学学报》2011年第4期657-663,共7页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基 金:国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2009BAG17B02);国家自然科学基金资助项目(50908100)
摘 要:为减小公交信号优先对社会车辆的影响,在交叉口不发生交通拥堵的前提下,提出了以饱和度为约束条件的公交车有限优先策略,并建立了非优先相位无绿灯时间补偿和有绿灯时间补偿的两种有限公交优先控制策略.用VISSIM软件对比研究了两种有限公交优先策略与无公交优先策略、绝对公交优先策略的效益.结果表明,在所有场景下,与无公交优先策略相比,两种有限公交优先策略的公交车延误平均降低22.9%和15.1%;与绝对优先策略相比,在公交车流量较大或者饱和度较高时,两种有限公交优先策略的社会车辆平均延误减少10.7%和16.5%.To reduce the negative effect on general traffic caused by bus signal priority(BSP),a conditional priority methodology that considers the saturation degree restriction in the premise that no traffic congestion occurs at the intersection was brought forward,and two bus signal priority strategies,with or without green time compensation to non-priority phase,were established.The two strategies were tested in the VISSIM environment and compared with non-priority strategy and unconditional BSP strategy.The results show that the two strategies proposed outperform the non-priority strategy by 22.9% and 15.1%,respectively,in reducing the average bus delay in all scenarios,and outperform the unconditional BSP strategy by 10.7% and 16.5%,respectively,in reducing the increase of average vehicle delay in the scenarios with high bus frequency or high saturation degree
关 键 词:交通控制 有限公交优先 绿灯时间补偿 效益评价 孤立交叉口
分 类 号:U491.51[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91