检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐海萍[1] 骆金华[1] 孙杰[1] 徐晓晗[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院手术室,210029
出 处:《江苏医药》2011年第14期1691-1693,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨管状胃代食管术后胃食管反流程度。方法按手术方式将31例食管癌患者分为管状胃(A)组和传统手术(B)组。术后1周,胃肠功能动态pH值监测仪测定24 h的pH值。记录全天的反流次数、长反流(>5 min)次数、最长反流持续时间、pH<4的时间及其占全天的比率。结果与B组比较,A组反流次数少[(10.85±16.85)次vs.(0.22±0.44)次],长反流次数少[(2.00±0.00)次vs.(0.42±0.78)次],最长反流持续时间短[(4.28±6.04)min vs.(0.22±0.66)min],时间pH<4(pH<4的时间)短[(15.00±18.60)min vs.(0.55±0.88)min],时间pH<4分数(pH<4的时间占全天的比率)小[(1.18±1.44)%vs.(0.05±0.13)%],DeMeester评分低(4.90±6.07)分vs.(0.42±0.29)分。Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of easophageal reconstruction with tube-shaped stomach in attenuating gastroeasophageal reflux in patients underwent resection of easophageal carcinoma.Methods Redical section was performed in 31 patients with easophageal carcinoma and easophageal reconstruction was made with tube-shaped stomach(group A,16 cases) or conventional tecnique(group B,15 cases).The indicators evaluating gastroeasophageal reflux one week after operation were recorded and monitored with dynamic gastroentestinal function and 24-h pH monitor.Results Compared to group B,the pstients in group A had less times of reflux[(10.85±16.85) times vs.(0.22±0.44) times] and the times of long-lasting(5 min) reflux [(2.00±0.00) times vs.(0.42±0.78) times],shorter lasting of maximum long-lasting reflux[(4.28±6.04) min vs.(0.22±0.66) min],shorter time of pH less than 4[(15.00±18.60) min vs.(0.55±0.88) min] and less ratio of the time of pH less than 4 to 24 hours[(1.18±1.44)% vs.(0.05±0.13)%],and less DeMeester score [(4.90±6.07) points vs.(0.42±0.29)points(P0.05).Conclusion Gastric tube reconstruction can decrease the incidence of gastroeasophageal reflux in easophageal carcinoma patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.59.124