检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张景焕[1] 王亚男[2] 初玉霞[1] 徐希铮[1]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014 [2]济宁职业技术学院,济宁272137
出 处:《心理科学》2011年第4期993-998,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(批准号:08JAXLX010);山东省自然科学基金项目(批准号:ZR2009DM023);国家社科基金重大项目(批准号:0882Z002);山东省科技发展计划项目(批准号:2009GG20001017)资助
摘 要:以216名初中二年级学生为被试,采用现场实验,探讨个体创意自我效能感在竞争、评价和时间三种压力情境下对创造力的影响。结果发现,三种压力对于总体创造力的影响不同;三种压力都降低了变通性;时间、评价压力分别提高了流畅性和新颖性,竞争压力既提高了流畅性又提高了新颖性;压力不改变个体创意自我效能感,中等创意自我效能感被试在压力情境下具有最好的变通表现,效能感低分组表现最差。Environment and personality are closely related to creativity in many aspects, which is widely accepted by most psychologists. Just as pressure is one of the most important environment factors that can influence creativity efficiently, so creative self-effieacy is a very important component of personality which plays a crucial role in creativity. Prior studies explored the effect of pressure on creativity and the relationship between creative self-efficacy and creativity. But most of these studies failed to take different pressure contexts into account. What's more, prior studies seldom revealed the joint effect of pressure and creative self-efficacy on creativity. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of creative self-efficacy on creativity under three pressure contexts (the time pressure, the competitive pressure and the evaluation pressure) with field experiments, and to clarify the effect of these three kinds of pressure contexts on different aspects of creativity. A 3 (three pressure contexts) × 3 (levels of creative self-efficacy) between-subject design was adopted to examine the hypotheses. Data were collected from 216 middle school students among 3 classes in Grade Two in a middle school of China. The students completed the questionnaires regarding creativity and creative self-efficacy. Different pressure contexts were generated by different instructions. Variance analysis and t test were employed to analyze the data. The main results of the study are as follows: (1)Under time pressure, the fluency score enhanced significantly, and flexibility and originality decreased significantly; under the competitive condition, the general score of creativity enhanced significantly, and the fluency and originality score enhanced significantly, but the flexibility score decreased significantly. Under the evaluation condition, the general score of creativity and flexibility decreased significantly, the originality score enhanced significantly. That is, effects of pressure on total creativ
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15