检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱爽[1] 范阳阳[1] 刘科文[1] 孟宪伟[1] 孙春艳[1] 曹建琴[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学大庆校区,黑龙江省大庆市163319
出 处:《中国全科医学》2011年第22期2572-2573,共2页Chinese General Practice
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅科研课题:"医学生情绪问题的评估;预警与干预研究"(12511283)
摘 要:目的调查医学生焦虑情绪状况及其与自我效能感和应对方式的关系,为提高医学生心理健康教育工作质量提供依据。方法采用分层抽样的方法,随机抽取440名医学生为研究对象进行问卷调查和心理测评,测评工具包括焦虑自评量表(SAS)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、应对方式量表(CSS)。结果医学生高焦虑水平的发生率为17.5%,焦虑水平在性别、年级及不同专业间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。焦虑与自责、幻想、退避、合理化4个因子呈正相关,焦虑与自我效能、解决问题呈负相关(P<0.05)。自责、解决问题、合理化、求助4个变量是焦虑情绪的有效预测因素,联合解释焦虑情绪总变异的14.6%。结论应根据医学生焦虑情绪的状况及影响因素,采取针对性的健康教育和心理干预,预防和降低焦虑问题的发生率。Objective To investigate the anxiety status and its correlations with general self-efficacy and coping style among medical students with the hope to provide reference for mental health education.Methods A total of 440 medical students,sampled by stratified method,were surveyed with Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) and General Self Efficacy Scale(GSES),Coping Style Scale(CSS).Results Incidence of high anxiety level was 17.5%.Differences of anxiety levels were significant with respect to sex,school-year,and discipline(P0.05).Anxiety was positively correlated with self-blame,fantasy,avoidance,and rationalization;anxiety was negatively correlated with self-efficacy and problem solving(P0.05).Stepwise regression analysis showed that self-blame,problem solving,rationalizing,and help-seeking were among the effective predictors of anxiety,explaining 14.6% of the total variance of anxiety.Conclusion Anxiety should be prevented or reduced by special helath education and intervention designed according to the related factors.
分 类 号:R749.72[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15