检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘万海[1]
机构地区:[1]渤海大学教育与体育学院
出 处:《全球教育展望》2011年第9期9-12,18,共5页Global Education
基 金:2009教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"新课程下德性教学的理论深化与创新机制研究"资助(立项号:09YJC880048)
摘 要:长期以来,不少教育实践工作者对于真正的教学仍缺乏深刻全面的领会。本文通过回溯教育"善"的内涵衍化,揭示了自古代以来评判教学的视角位移,总体上呈现出从教学的目的论取向到实践伦理立场的变换,并进而考察了近代以来被视为教学理想范型的"教育性教学"命题的本意与价值,及其后来在跨文化传译与诠释过程中发生的价值悖离。进而,从教学的"教育性"延展至"道德性"的讨论,指出当代探求真正教学意味的重点应在关注实践伦理,而其评判标准应坚持"以善致善"即目的与手段的统整性思考。Over a long period of time, many teachers still lack profound and comprehensive understanding about what is gen-uine teaching. In this article it reveals the conversion of perspectives from teleology to practical ethics of teaching by tracing back the connotation derivation of the "goodness" of education, on which teaching is evaluated since ancient times. In such back- ground it probes into the original idea and values of the proposition of "educative instruction", which is regarded as ideal teach- ing model since modern times, and the deviation of values during trans - cultural translation and interpretation. And then, in the discuss that extends from educative instruction to the virtue of teaching, it points out the emphasis on researching the meaning of genuine teaching contemporarily is to focus on practical ethics, and to integrate the aims and means of teaching as a whole evaluation standard.
分 类 号:G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145