检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张婉丽[1] 吴玉兰[2] 邱开雄[1] 简红[2] 姚畅宜[1]
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院,云南昆明650031 [2]昆明理工大学,云南昆明650093
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2011年第7期147-149,154,共4页Journal of Kunming Medical College
摘 要:目的探讨创新思维教学法在口腔内科实验课双语教学中的应用效果.方法将昆明医学院口腔学院2007级本科生共75名学生随机分为两组,采用创新思维教学法双语教学模式和传统教学方法进行口腔内科实验课教学,实验中及操作结束后打分并进行问卷调查,对两种教学效果进行评价.结果通过实验中及结束后的操作打分和问卷调查,创新思维教学法双语教学模式的实验组成绩优于传统教学法(P<0.01),学生认为创新思维教学法双语教学模式优于传统教学法(P<0.01).结论创新思维教学法双语教学模式提高了学生学习兴趣和学习效率,有利于推动口腔内科实验课教学,促进口腔及专业英语教学.Objective To analyze the application of creative thinking(convergent thinking and divergent thinking)in bilingual teaching of preclinical Stomatology.Methods 75 students from Grade 2007 in Stomatology Faculty of KMU were randomly divided into 2 groups,one of which(Study Group)were taught the same content by creative-thinking bilingual methods and the other of which(Control Group)were taught by traditional teaching methods.During and after experiments,grades for everyone and questionnaires were recorded and the two teaching methods were evaluated by students.Results Students believed that bilingual method with creative-thinking was more efficient than the traditional one;the scores of students in Study Group were higher than those in Control group.Conclusion The creative-thinking bilingual method can enhance students learning interest and efficiency to obtain higher scores,and can promote preclinical teaching and bilingual stomatology teaching.
关 键 词:创新思维教学法 双语教学 口腔内科实验课 下颌第一磨牙根管治疗
分 类 号:G424.1[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145