检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡金旺[1]
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2011年第5期45-49,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:四川省教育厅社会科学科研基地项目"苏轼与王安石哲学思想比较研究"(10ZX007)
摘 要:以正统儒家自居的学者对王安石《尚书新义》作出了否定性评价,主要原因在于他们认为他的学术不正,但也并非完全否认其学术价值。王安石在《尚书新义》的诠释中表现出的一些思想例如君臣思想、对微子出走行事的看法及对法家思想的吸收利用,都与正统儒家思想格格不入,而这是因为王安石不仅遵循道德性的标准,而且也遵循智性和有用性的标准而形成的,是他的早期哲学思想在变法时期的延续与发展。Neo-confucianism made a negative evaluation for Wang Anshi's New Commentaries on the Book of History.The main reason was that they thought Wang Anshi's academic research is not integrity,but they did not deny its academic value.Wang Anshi showed some thought for example of favorable king-subject view,Weizi's exodus behavior,absorption and utilization of Legalist School thought in New Commentaries on the Book of History,and it was antipathetic with orthodox Confucianism's.And this was not only because of following morality standard,and also of the intelligence and usefulness standard.It was continuation and development of his early philosophy thought during the political reform period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15