检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学管理学院,南京210093
出 处:《管理案例研究与评论》2011年第5期361-368,共8页Journal of Management Case Studies
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71072041);南京大学商学院科研基金项目(2009-03)
摘 要:本文以西安杨森销售团队辅导系统为例,探讨了Hackman模型"辅导干涉—团队过程—团队绩效"这一因果链中多种相关因素之间的内在关系,并阐明了领导者如何针对这一过程对团队进行系统高效的辅导。本研究认为,基于"辅导干涉—团队过程—团队绩效"这一因果链,团队辅导并不应仅仅限于针对成员关系、成员技能的辅导,团队辅导应当更关注于促进成员更好地利用现有资源,促进团队成员的成长和整体经验的积累,促进团队战略与外部环境的匹配,从而保证团队的高绩效。当然,企业文化是团队辅导实践获得效果的必要保证,这也是本案例的一个重要启示,是对未来Hackman模型改进的有益线索。This paper takes the coaching system of the sales team of Xi'an-Janssen Pharmaceutical as a typical case to address all links in the coaching intervention-team process-team performance sequence and to illustrate how leaders can carry out effective coaching in this sequence. It argues that the aim of coaching should not be limited to improving the relationships among employees or improving employees' skills. In fact, team coaching should also aim to guarantee the team's high performance by urging members to make better use of existing resources and accumulate holistic experience, and ensuring that team strategies correspond to the external environment. Company culture is a prerequisite to effective team coaching, which is another important inspiration in the study that may help future researchers to construct more effective and comprehensive models.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222