制度不变性与响应性的悖论——“德治”与“智治”两种组织治理模式的对比  

Paradox on Invariability and Adaptability of Institutions:Comparative Governance Modes between "Rule of Virtue" and "Rule of Intelligence"

作　　者：王凤彬[1] 李彬[1] 陶哲雄[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学商学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国软科学》2011年第11期172-183,共12页China Soft Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(71102074)

摘　　要：在具有浓厚文化传统的社会中,相关制度条件会影响到组织治理之特定模式的有效性及主导逻辑。基于先秦"道理论"思想内涵及其传承轨迹的梳理,本文在区分制度制定与执行两个环节的有关制度不变性与响应性"悖论"问题的探讨中,对"德治"和"智治"两种不同组织治理模式各自适用的制度条件以及中国业界实践重塑的方向进行了案例分析与理论评述相糅合的研究,使"一(道)与多(理)"、"不变与变"关系命题获得重新审视。The institutional conditions in a society with strong cultural heritages influence the dominated logic and effectiveness of specific modes of organizational governance.Based on the connotation and evolution of ＂morality vs.rationality＂ philosophy emerged in the pre-Qing Dynastic,this paper discriminates the formulation and implementation stages of institutionalized governance,and analyzes their distinct paradoxes between invariability and adaptability.Accompanying with cross-case study on current business and public practices,two different modes of organizational governance supported either by the ＂rule of virtue＂ or by the ＂rule of intelligence＂ are identified and the propositions regarding ＂universality vs.particularity＂ and ＂invariability vs.variability＂ are re-examined,and the direction in reshaping China＇s organizational governance delineated.

关 键 词：制度变迁 组织治理 一般化 类型化 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]