检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚旭[1,2] 朴秋虹[1] 喻婧[1] 杨燕萍[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学心理学系,北京100871 [2]北京大学机器感知与智能教育部重点实验室,北京100871
出 处:《心理科学进展》2011年第12期1741-1748,共8页Advances in Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31070898);韩国学中央研究院基金项目(Academy of Korean Studies Grant;AKS-2011-R-36)资助
摘 要:句法优先理论假设词类加工功能上优先于语义、动词论元结构和话语信息加工。来自德语和法语的证据显示,词类违反阻断语义整合和动词论元结构加工,因而词类优先于语义和动词论元结构。关于词类加工在功能上是否优先于话语信息加工,尚无来自任何语言的证据。汉语证据尽管显示词类并不优先于语义,但未充分讨论任务因素的影响。将来研究有必要使用ERP技术和违反范式,从语义整合、动词论元结构加工和话语水平加工等多个层面,同时操纵词类的正确性和非句法因素,考察句法特性上与德语和法语不同的语言,如汉语和韩语。这方面研究将有助于洞察一个语言的语言学特性如何制约或调整词类加工的功能性质。Syntax-first theories assume that the processing of syntactic category (SC) is functionally prior to that of lexical semantics, verb argument structure, and discourse information. Previous event-related brain potential (ERP) studies in German and French have demonstrated that SC violations block both semantic and argument structure processing and thus SC has a functional primacy over the other two processes. It is still unknown whether there is also a functional primacy of SC over discourse processing, for any language. Although previous studies in Chinese revealed no functional primacy of SC over semantics, they didn't thoroughly address the possible influence of experimental tasks on the findings. Further studies need to investigate the functional status of SC relative to a variety of non-syntactic information such as lexical semantics, verb argument structure, as well as discourse information, in languages that differ from German and French in terms of syntactic properties, such as Chinese and Korean. In addition, these studies should record ERPs in the violation paradigm in which non-syntactic factors and the correctness of SC are manipulated simultaneously, as done in previous studies.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222