语境的错位——米勒的“文学终结论”在中国  

Context Dislocation:Millet's Discourse upon "The End of Literature" in China

作　　者：周计武[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学中文系,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《艺术百家》2011年第6期89-95,共7页Hundred Schools In Arts

基　　金：2007年度国家社科基金青年项目"现代性语境下的艺术终结问题研究"(项目编号:07CZW006)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：当代文艺界针对米勒的"文学终结论",从文学的终结、图文之争、文学和文艺研究的边界等层面展开了颇有成效的理论争鸣。我们认为,在技术与资本的合谋之下,影像的泛滥和审美的泛化的确改变了现代文艺家族的内在结构和现代学科体制。但是,文学终结论并不等于宣判文学的死刑。我们不仅要在事实判断与价值判断之间保持必要的张力,而且要警惕"语言文字崇拜"和"图像拜物教"两种极端的文化倾向。Millet＇s＂ the end of literature＂ leads a passionate theoretical debate. Contemporary scholars discuss the problem from perspective of the end of literature, image and literature, the boundary between literature and literal research. In an era of marriage of technology and captain, the overflowing of image and aesthetics truly transforms the inner structure of modern literal world and modern disciplinary system. However, discourse of ＂the end of literature＂ does not sentence literature to death. We should not only preserve a necessary strain between fact judgment and value judgment, but also avoid two extreme cultural tendencies of ＂worship of language and literature＂ and ＂fetishism＂.

关 键 词：文艺美学 文学的终结 文学终结论 图文之争 文学与文学研究的边界 

分 类 号：J06[艺术—艺术理论]