性骚扰案件证据认定之实证分析——以海峡两岸的两起案件为例  

An Empirical Analysis of Adoption of Sexual Harassment Evidences—based on Two Cases across the Taiwan Straits

作　　者：骆东平[1] 谭彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]三峡大学法学院,湖北宜昌443002

出　　处：《三峡论坛》2011年第6期104-108,149,共5页China Three Gorges Tribune

基　　金：骆东平主持的国家社会科学基金项目"性骚扰纠纷解决制度研究"的阶段性成果;基金号(08CFX045)

摘　　要：在性骚扰案件中,难以收集到有效证据的问题一度被认为是妥当解决这类争议的最大障碍。通过对海峡两岸法院就两起性骚扰案件的审理进行比较研究后发现,人们的这种"共识"实际上只反应了问题的一个方面,而问题的另一个重要方面在于我国大陆地区法院的法官过分追求直接证据与经验法则的不妥当运用,这主要源于法官性别平等视角的缺乏并由此而产生了错误的解释框架。It has always been thought that the biggest impediment in hearing cases of sexual harassment is to collect tangible proofs.However,it is discovered that 'the consensus' is only one factor in hearing cases after analyzing two cases of sexual harassment across the Taiwan Straits,the other factor is that the judges on China mainland focus on the first-hand evidence unduly,resort to their law of experience improperly and build up incorrect interpretation of the cases,which arises from their not trying the cases in view of gender equality.

关 键 词：性骚扰 证据认定 经验法则 性别平等 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]