功能语法与认知语法的扼要对比(英文)  

A Brief Comparison of Functional Grammar and Cognitive Grammar

作　　者：王睿[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南民族大学外国语学院,云南昆明650031

出　　处：《语文学刊（外语教育与教学）》2011年第12期12-14,共3页Journal of Language and Literature

摘　　要：由韩礼德提出的系统功能语法和由兰盖克(R. W. Langacker) 提出的认知语法代表着语言学领域的两个理论潮流。前者继承并发扬了语言学中的语言功能理论,在描写语法时将语言的社会、文化环境考虑在内。后者则是从语言使用者的认知和心理状态出发来研究语言。从表面上看这两种语法是两种截然不同的理论,但仔细研读,我们会发现二者都将语言看作是一个系统,都认为语言研究应以语言实例分析为基础,语言描述应自然,不应将语法与语义区别开来。The systemic -functional grammar proposed by M. A. K. Halliday and the cognitive grammar founded by R.W. Langacker represent two streams of theories in linguistics. Superficially these two types of grammar are absolutely different approaches to language, but a careful study shows that there are some similarities between the two. Both regard language as a system, and stress that linguistic description should both be natural and be based on the data of language use, and that semantics and lexieo - grammar are closely related.

关 键 词：功能语法 认知语法 对比 

分 类 号：H313[语言文字—英语]