检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州商学院,甘肃兰州730020
出 处:《首都经济贸易大学学报》2012年第1期5-12,共8页Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business
基 金:陕西省社会科学基金项目<陕西城镇化推动农村经济发展机制研究>(项目编号11D010)
摘 要:适宜的农地产权制度不仅能有效促进土地资源的优化配置,还能为"三农"问题的解决提供制度保障。关于中国农地产权制度进一步变革的方向,学术界主要有三种论点:农地国有化、农地私有化及完善论。在对各种论点进行评判的基础上,应该认为,农地国有化与农地私有化都不可行,应继续坚持当前的农地承包经营制度,并看牢所有权、稳定承包权、放活经营权。完善当前农地制度的关键还在于强化相关法律的执行力度,建立各类土地流转中介组织,恰当发挥村委会的作用,并进行配套制度的变革。A suitable cropland property rights system can not only promote the optimal allocation of cropland resource, but also provide an institutional guarantee for solving the three agricultural problems in china. This paper sorts out the relevant literature on different ideas on cropland institutional reform in China, sums up three main ideas on the innovational direction which are cropland nationalization, cropland privatization and improving of the household contract responsibility system. Based on comments on different arguments, the paper points out that, cropland nationalization or cropland privatization is not feasible, China should continue adhering to the cropland contractual institution, control the property rights, stabilize contract rights, and liberalize management rights. It's also important to strengthen the enforcement of relevant laws, build cropland circulation intermediary organizations, protect the role of villages committees, and reform relevant supporting institution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.190