刑事裁判解释的规范化和具体化解析  

Criminal Justice Probe into Standardization of Interpretation and Concretization

作　　者：龙开祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东培正学院法学系,广东广州510830

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2011年第6期49-53,62,共6页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

摘　　要：规范化解释和具体化解释是我国解决刑事审判法律应用问题的两种方法,其中又以规范化解释为重点。规范化解释具有概括性、强制性、普遍性等特征。规范化解释和罪刑法定原则、罪责刑相适应原则、刑法目的都存在一定的冲突。规范化解释可以限制自由裁量权,但不能消除自由裁量权,更无法消除司法腐败。规范化解释可以规范一定的司法行为,但会严重影响法官审判的主动性和独立性。具体化解释符合刑事审判的特征,有利于厘清立法权和司法权的界限,是解决刑事审判法律应用问题的根本途径和最佳选择。Standardized explanations and specific explanation is addressing criminal justice on the legal application of two methods,which focus on standardized interpretation.The features of the standardized explanations are generality,compulsory,universal and others.There is a conflict between Standardized explanations and the principle of a legally Prescribed Punishment for a specified crime,the principle of suiting punishment to crime and Criminal Responsibility.The purposes criminal law standardized interpretation can limit the discretion,but not eliminate discretion,will not be able to eliminate judicial corruption.Standardized interpretation can standardize certain judicial acts,but it would seriously affect the judge＇s initiative and independence.Materialize interpreted in line with characteristics of a criminal trial,and clarified the limits of legislative power and the right to justice,is the essential way to solve the problem of application of criminal law and the best choice.

关 键 词：刑事裁判 法律应用问题 自由裁量权 规范化 具体化 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]