检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《当代经济管理》2012年第1期81-88,共8页Contemporary Economic Management
基 金:全国教育科学规划重点课题<企业内部培训模式及效果研究>(CKA030063);中国人民大学研究生科学研究基金项目<企业培训效果优化机制的理论模型构建及实证研究>(11XNH175)
摘 要:在系统归纳和整理影响我国企业培训效果制约因素的基础上,借助解释结构模型方法的优势,厘清了各个制约因素间相互作用的内在机理。研究表明:企业培训制度滞后、企业高层对企业培训重视不足以及企业培训职能归属定位模糊对企业培训效果的制约作用最大,而培训需求与企业特征脱节、企业培训财务投入不足以及缺乏有效的企业培训评估机制的制约作用次之,员工缺乏积极性以及受训员工接受能力有限对企业培训效果的制约作用最小。因此,企业应该基于不同制约因素的内在机理有步骤、有重点的提升企业培训效果。Summarizing and coordinating the constraining factors which affect the effectiveness of China's enterprise training,this article makes use of the advantages of Interpretative Structural Modeling to clarify the interaction relationship among these constraining factors.This study shows there factors: the lag of corporate training system,the lack of attention that senior executives pay on corporate trainings as well as the vague positioning of the corporate training function contributing mostly to the effectiveness of corporate training.The out of joint between training demand and enterprise characteristics,the shortage of financial investment and the lack of effective corporate evaluation mechanism play the secondary role,followed by the lack of staff motivation and the limitation of staff receptivity.Therefore,enterprises should study the inner mechanism of these different constraining factors and improve the effectiveness of corporate training step by step.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28