检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田宝[1] 李旭培[2,3] 滕秀杰[4] 时勘[2,3]
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学心理系,北京100089 [2]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [3]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049 [4]首都经济贸易大学学生处,北京100070
出 处:《心理科学》2012年第1期165-170,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71072150);北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室;北京市属高等学校人才强教深化计划学术创新团队建设项目(PHR201007109)资助
摘 要:为探讨压力情境认知评价与工作倦怠的关系,选取北京、河南两家公司的303名员工进行了调查。分层回归分析结果发现,在控制了人口统计学因素之后,挑战评价对玩世不恭存在显著正向预测作用,控制评价对情绪衰竭、玩世不恭和成就感低落存在显著负向预测作用;进一步分析发现,控制评价在情绪中心应对与情绪衰竭、问题中心应对与成就感低落之间的关系上具有调节作用。结果表明,压力情境认知评价是影响员工工作倦怠的重要因素。Factors affecting job burnout are the focus of attention of many researches. Besides individual traits and environmental characteristics, studies begin to pay more attention to the effects of transactional factors on job burnout, and believe that different levels of burnout felt by individuals mainly came from their various perceptions, appraisals and attributions of situations. Researchers indicate that the effect of cognitive appraisal on job burnout should merit more special attention. Previous researches also showed that cognitive appraisals of stress situations had relevance to the stress situations of employees, and could adjust the relationship between stress coping styles and mental health (such as depression). Based on Lazarus’ cognitive transactional model, this study investigated the effects of challenge appraisal, threat appraisal, control appraisal on job burnout, and the moderate effects of control appraisal on the relationship between coping strategies and job burnout. 303 employees from two companies in Beijing and Henan province were selected to fulfill a self-reported questionnaire. The participants were called together by their respective human resources department. After the researchers explained the procedures and requirements, the participants would complete self-report questionnaires. The questionnaires were collected immediately once completed. Established measurements were used to capture the key variables in this study. Items selected from studies of Folkman et al.(1986), Parkes(1984), Hudek-Kneevic ' Kardum(2000) were used to measure challenge appraisal. threat appraisal, control appraisal. Cronbach’s alpha's were .83.78 and .70 respectively in this study. We used Shi’s coping strategy scale to measure problem-focused coping strategy and emotion-focused coping strategy. Cronbach’s alpha's were .75 and .83 respectively in this study. The revised edition of MBI-GS was used to measure job burnout, and Cronbach’s alpha's were .88 for emotional exhaustion
分 类 号:B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28