检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学护理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150086
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2012年第1期32-33,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目(11531137)
摘 要:目的:比较分析学生、教师、督导三方对教师实践教学质量的评价结果,从中发现问题,为完善教学评价提供借鉴。方法:采用自设评价标准对10名教师实践教学设计讲授进行三方评价,对得分进行比较。结果:对10名教师中7名教师的评价基本一致,对3名教师的评价存在较大差距。结论:学生和教师参与教学质量评价,有利于调动学生和教师广泛参与教学、关心教学的积极性,有利于促进各项教学改革的顺利开展,有利于提高学生的主体意识和评判性思维能力。Objective: To compare and analyze the evaluation results of students, teachers and supervisors about practice teaching quality. The aim is to find the problems and provide references for improving the teaching evaluation. Methods: Self-designed evaluation standard was applied to evaluate ten teachers' design and teaching practice, and then the scores were compared. Results: The evaluation on seven teachers of ten is basically consistent; three of them are obviously different. Conclusion: The participation of students and teachers, who took part in the teaching quality evaluation, can widely arouse the enthusiasm of students and teachers in their learning and teaching, promote teaching reform and improve students' critical thinking abihty.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222