荀子与董仲舒“治道”思想之比较  

The Comparison of the Governance between Xun Zi and Dong Zhong-shu

作　　者：高春菊[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡水学院法政学院,河北衡水053000

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2012年第2期6-9,共4页Journal of Hengshui University

基　　金：2011年河北省社会科学基金项目(HB11LS005)

摘　　要：荀子、董仲舒的治道思想都是在国家、社会处于转型时期提出来的。两者治道思想的共性与差别在于:在管理本体论上,荀子要求管理者面对自然之天必须发挥主体能动性,而董仲舒认为"天"不仅是宇宙万物的最高本原,也是社会等级秩序和伦理准则的唯一来源;在管理行为观上,两人都继承了经典儒家的管理行为理论,主张为政以德和贤人政治;在管理价值论方面,都认同"不与民争利";在管理人性观方面和管理控制论上,都认为人性可塑、导人为善。The governace of Xun zi and Dong Zhong-shu are both put forward at the transformation period of the state and society.The similarities and differences of them are： In the perspective of management ontology,Xun Zi required the managers must have subjective initiative when they faced the natural＂Tian＂,but Dong Zhong-shu thought the ＂Tian＂ is not only the highest principle of universe,but also the only source of the social rank order and ethical standards;In the perspective of management concept,they inherited the confucian theory of administrative behavior,advocating governing by morality and wisdom politics;In the perspective of management theory of value,they both agreed that ＂Do not compete with people＂;In the perspective of human nature and management cybernetics,they both agreed that people could be created and led to be good.

关 键 词：荀子 董仲舒 治道思想 隆礼重法 《天人三策》 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B222.6