检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐英瑾[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《学术月刊》2012年第4期55-64,共10页Academic Monthly
基 金:霍英东教育基金会第十二届高等院校青年教师基金基础性研究课题"对于进化心理学的哲学基础的反思"(NO.121095)的资助
摘 要:杜威哲学(尤其是其论文《对野蛮人心灵的解释》)启发了一种对演化论式知识论的重构和辩护。从总体上说,这种知识论理论依然是"可靠主义"的一个变种,因为它依然试图通过认知机制自身的可靠性来为由这些机制所产生的信念提供认识担保。但它至少在两个关键方面和传统可靠主义分道扬镳:第一,通过对于杜威的实用主义哲学的继承,这种新可靠主义不再把"真信念比例"视为界定认知机制可靠性的基本话语框架,而主张在一个更深的层面上用"有用性"来替换"真";第二,通过对于演化论思想的更直接的依赖,这种新可靠主义排除了用其他非科学方式来解释人类认知机制之可靠性的可能,并通过这种排除更加紧密地将知识论研究和科学研究联系到了一起。从这种意义上说,这种被"杜威化"的人类信念辩护方案,才是一种真正彻底的自然主义方案。与之相比较,传统的可靠主义理论却完全有可能和一种非自然主义的(甚至神学的)立场相互结合(如在普兰丁格的知识论那里)。This article is intended to offer a systematic reconstruction of John Dewey's evolutionary approach to epistemology by basing on the reading of his comments on "Savage Minds". I will argue that his epistemological theory, thus reconstructed, can be somehow viewed as a variant of contemporary "epistemologieal reliabilism" in the following sense: it is intended to warrant human's beliefs in terms of the "reliability" of the cognitive faculties which have produced these beliefs. But it is still different from the standard reliabilism in two aspects: First, its substantial involvement of pragmatism into the Deweyan epistemological proposal makes the semantic notion "truth" itself less fundamental than reliabilists have traditionally conceived. Hence, according to this updated proposal, it will be no longer plausible to define the reliability of cognitive faculties in terms of "truth ratio of the produced beliefs", unless "truth" is replaced by "usefulness/utility". Second, due to its more substantial reliance on evolutionary theory, this updated epistemological proposal precludes any attempts to explain the reliability of human's cognitive faculties in some none-scientific manner. Hence, the whole proposal turns out to be more "naturalistic" than the standard reliabilism, according to which a reliabilist epistemological approach may also be accommodated in a theological framework (e. g. , in Plantinga's case).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222