史家笔法作为中国古代小说评点话语的建构  

On Historian Writing as Chinese Ancient Novel Criticism Discourse

作　　者：张金梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北民族学院文学与传媒学院,湖北恩施445000

出　　处：《集美大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第2期89-94,共6页Journal of Jimei University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金(08XZW010);湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目(2011jyte052)

摘　　要：中国古代小说被视作正史附庸或直接被称为"稗官野史",所以评点家们常常以史家笔法作为评点话语,其主要表现有三:直接点明小说作者采用了《春秋》笔法;明确指出小说作品"章法句法本诸盲左腐迁",直接以《左传》、《史记》笔法标准评判小说;详细揭示古典小说中的曲笔褒贬与史家笔法相互融通。Chinese ancient novels were generally taken as a history appendage or was directly called ＂wild history＂.Therefore,Chinese ancient novel critics always took historian writing as Chinese ancient novel criticism discourse.First,they pointed out that the authors of Chinese ancient novels had adopted Spring Autumn Annals style.Second,they indicated some chapter rule and syntax in the novels came from Zuo Qiumings＇ and Sima Qians＇,and criticized them by the standard of Zuo Zhuan or Shi Ji style.Last,they revealed in detail the conformity between the novels＇ devious writing for praise and denouncement and historian writing.

关 键 词：《春秋》笔法 史家笔法 曲笔 小说评点 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]