“Liu Sanfu”:吕良佐还是刘承范?——刘承范《利玛(窦)传》读后(一)  

Who Was "Liu Sanfu"? Lü Liangzuo or Liu Chengfan? Remarks on Reading Liu Chengfan's Biography of Matteo Ricci(Ⅰ)

作　　者：宋黎明[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学思想史研究中心,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2011年第11期14-18,共5页Journal of Shaoguan University

摘　　要：在利玛窦从肇庆移居韶州之际,出现了一个来自韶州的官员"Liu Sanfu"。利玛窦笔下的"Liu Sanfu"历来被释读为吕良佐,他是韶州通判,俗称"三府"即"Sanfu"。而根据刘承范的说法,这个官员就是他本人,但他身为韶州同知,俗称"二府"。相关资料证明,"Liu Sanfu"即刘承范,而作为韶州同知,他是"刘二府","刘三府"当为利玛窦晚年记忆错误或笔误;相关资料也可证明,刘承范曾以韶州府同知身份短期兼任南韶兵备道,一如利玛窦和刘承范本人所记。Liu Sanfu,an officer from Shaozhou who appeared at the moment when Matteo Ricci was going to transfer from Zhaoqing to Shaozhou,has been traditionally interpreted as Lü Liangzuo,who was ＂3° collaterale＂ in Shaozhou,commonly called＂Sanfu＂.However,according to Liu Chengfan,this officer was himself,but he was Vice-Governor or ＂2° collaterale＂ of Shaozhou,commonly called ＂Erfu＂.This paper tries to testify that Liu Sanfu is properly Liu Chengfan,who should be ＂Liu Erfu＂,and ＂Liu Sanfu＂ must have been a mistake made by Matteo Ricci in his Storia.Furthermore,this paper tries to prove that,with the title of Vice-Governor of Shaozhou,Liu Chengfan functioned,contemporaneously and temporally,as a head of Military Defense Circuit of the Region,just as recorded both by Matteo Ricci and Liu Chengfan.

关 键 词：利玛窦 刘三府 吕良佐 刘承范 刘二府 韶州府同知 南韶兵备道 

分 类 号：K203[历史地理—历史学]